Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3003 14
Original file (NR3003 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTWCNT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 8. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2480

 

BAN
Docket No:NROQ3003-14
22 July 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TO: Secretary of the Navy

Sr A

Ret: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Fnel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5400 PERS-806 of
30 dun 2014

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s
Date of Rank be corrected to show 1 November 2013 vice 1
December 2013, now of record.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsaiman, Exnicios and
Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated pelow should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
Docket No:NRO3003-14

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:

a. Petitioner’s Date of Rank be changed from 1 December
2013 to 1 November 2013. .

b. Petitioner is entitled to all pay and allowances due to
the aforementioned correction.

c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's

proceedings in the above entitled as f uh.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN D . CASH
Recorder Acting\Recoreer

Be Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6({e))
ana having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

22 July 2014 Tete S

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2624 14

    Original file (NR2624 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to have his date of rank reset to 1 June 2013 vice 1 October 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, George and Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1177 14

    Original file (NR1177 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he had one additional award point that should have been added to the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2445 14

    Original file (NR2445 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval recora be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 October 2013 vice 1 November 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2992 14

    Original file (NR2992 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner signed and accepted her officer Appointment Acceptance and Oath of Office on 24 May 2013 yiee 3 July 2013, that her Pay Entry Base Date (PEBD) he corrected toe reflect the same and that she be reimbursed all pay and allowances authorized due to the change . 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalmen, Exnicios...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3535 14

    Original file (NR3535 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/AWF1 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination due to two missing award points. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3145 14

    Original file (NR3145 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MN1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2783 14

    Original file (NR2783 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to CTR2/E5 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2468 14

    Original file (NR2468 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 November 2013 vice 1 December 2013. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2427 14

    Original file (NR2427 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the , corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3600 14

    Original file (NR3600 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he declined Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage with spousal concurrence before his retirement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...